Skip to main content

Australia vs. India: in the shadow of Hughes

I watched nearly every ball played by Phillip Hughes in his last dozen Test match innings and while he wasn't the most attractive to watch, his fighting attitude and effort was always admirable even when out of his depth. Unlike many of the authors of pieces written since his tragic death, I wasn't of the opinion that Hughes would go on to become a consistently good Test match player but we will of course never find out now.

His shadow will mark this series now especially given that he might have featured in the first Test and who knows where things would have headed then? It makes writing a series preview hard as well and maybe I'll feel like doing a proper one only after the cricket has begun and taken us past the first Test. Hughes' absence will make the Australian team doubly determined to win and win well especially at the SCG. They were strong favourites already given their recent home record and the fact that India's young line-up is still building overseas experience. Dhoni's absence from the first Test stacks the odds even more in favour of Clarke's men and I would expect a 3-0 result with anything better a bonus for India.

The last two series between these two countries had a curious symmetry to them even apart from the obvious 4-0 scorelines. Dhoni missed the last Test match in Australia and Clarke did the same in India. Both the teams took significant personnel hits after the losses, with Dravid and Laxman calling it a day for India and for the Aussies, Mickey Arthur was given the boot (though Matthew Wade and Ed Cowan have also lost ground since). Virat Kohli stood tall amidst the ruins of the Indian batting down under and Steven Smith did the same in India and the two are now arguably their team's main batsmen as well as captains-in-waiting.

The contests were sorely lacking in both those series though, especially after the first three days or so of the first Test. Hopefully that can change in this round even if the results don't surprise. India go in with many more question marks especially around the top order batting and the spin bowling but Australia too have some answers to find. Harris, Haddin, and Rogers will not last much longer and the replacements are not obvious. Two allrounders might be too many to play and Peter Siddle is showing slow but sure signs of becoming the next Ishant Sharma. Nathan Lyon will also be on notice especially with another Ashes series coming up. And will their two left arm bombers, Warner and Johnson be able to continue their astonishing run of form from last season?

For India, any improvements shown by Kohli, Pujara, and Dhawan from their form in England will be a big plus and crucial to their future, especially for the Delhi opener. The same is true for Shami among the bowlers and Bhuvneshwar's injury gives him some breathing space and probably a couple of Tests at least. Dhoni will also hope that his relative consistency and that of Vijay, Rahane, and Ishant Sharma continues. In my view though, the biggest disappointment from India overseas since 2011 has been their spin bowling and it would be good to see Karn Sharma given a good go in this series. He surely can't do much worse than Ashwin or Jadeja have done.

Whether these answers come through or not though, it will be good to have cricket going again. As Clarke said, that's what Hughes would have wanted and its the least the players owe one of their brethren.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...