Skip to main content

New eras, new leaders

The last time India and Australia played a series of four matches (or more) with no changes in captaincy on either side, the Aussies were still a largely all-conquering team and Clarke and Dhoni had just about established themselves as mainstays. The current series is the fourth full one since then (excluding the two match series in 2010) and a combination of injury, retirement, and suspensions has meant that each one has featured multiple leaders. And this time has been one better with changes on both sides. I can't remember when that happened last even in a series involving England :-)

Going in, the expectation was that Dhoni would miss the first Test but captain for the rest and Haddin would stand in for Clarke for the full series. Two shocks of varying degrees in Hughes' tragic death and Dhoni's sudden retirement have turned that around on its head and its the future leaders (and currently the best batsman) on either side who're in charge heading into Sydney.

For Kohli and India, its certainly a new era and a chance to start to shape a team for the future. So far in this tour, the batting (or a few of the batsmen) has shown signs of settling but the bowling continues to be horrid (as Kohli is finding out the hard way at the time of writing this). Ishant Sharma is now not just the most experienced player in the side but also the only bowler who appears to have any sort of control over his radar. Its unfortunate that Shami, Yadav, and Aaron who all made bright starts to their careers in India haven't shown the ability to replicate anything remotely close to it overseas. Worse still, they can't even appear to do the basics of putting six balls in the same place in an over consistently. And when Australia's spinner outbowls India's you know things can't be good. Kohli has made all the right noises about boldness as captain so far but he will quickly realise that when your bowlers can't back it up with performances, those same words can get very hollow very soon. He will learn with time but unless India can find bowlers who can do the same, that ranking is not going anywhere anytime soon.

Steve Smith has no such worries with his bowling line-up, not for the moment at least. Harris and Johnson are certainly amongst the top bowlers in world cricket today and probably amongst the best ten that Australia have ever produced, certainly on the basis of strike rate. Hazlewood and Lyon have also been solid and a bench consisting of Starc, Siddle, Pattinson, Cummins etc is one that most teams would be very envious of. Its not a stretch to say that when fully fit, any of these guys would be better than the drivel that goes in the name of Indian pace bowling.

It is the source of runs that will give Smith and Australia more cause to worry, especially for the future. With Clarke's return uncertain, there is a dangerous degree of dependence on Warner and Smith to do the century making. Rogers has contributed consistently but he won't be around much longer and the rest of the line-up hasn't been shown up only because the bowling they've faced has been so shoddy. Watson is clearly on borrowed time, and Marsh and Burns nowhere near settled. England will not be overly concerned about the summer just yet, especially if Anderson and Broad can stay fit.

India's batting on the other hand is its sole shining star at the moment, and especially compared to the bowling looks positively opulent. Kohli, Rahane, and Vijay have all gone a long way to establishing their credentials overseas and Pujara and Rohit Sharma are too good to not do the same fairly soon. There's lots of contenders around for the keeper's slot as well and Dhoni's batting shouldn't be missed much. His calmness as skipper on the other hand will be, especially when the bowling is going at five an over (as they are right now).

For now, I'm sticking with my original 3-0 prediction. That would plummet India to #7 on the ICC rankings, which seems a good assessment of the task that lies ahead for Kohli. The new era is not quite here yet for India, at least by way of results.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...