Skip to main content

Dravid's turn to follow


With Kumble joining Ganguly in making the right decision for their careers, hopefully Dravid will also see the light and follow suit. He has really struggled for runs over the last year or so and increasingly is finding new (and very un-Dravidlike) ways to get out. Over the last two years he has averaged 32.04 (which has brought his career ave down to 53 from 58). Take out the two matches against Bangladesh and this goes down to 29.53 with a solitary hundred and six fifties. Anyone else with that kind of a record would have been dropped by now. In fact its surprising that Laxman who averages 55.68 in that period and Ganguly who averages 46.48 have faced more scrutiny and faced the chop when India play five bowlers. Proud man that he is, it doesn't behoove Dravid to hold on to his place just on past reputation.

Having said that, I really hope he's able to do a Sampras and go out with a bang in Nagpur. A hundred for Dravid and an Indian win would be an ideal note to finish the series and for Dravid to call time. Of the Fab Five, in the long run I think it is Dravid that will be missed the most. Not only is his elegant yet steely style of batting and grafting going out of fashion, none of the youth brigade come even close to matching his abilities as a slip fielder. So its going to be a double blow when he retires. Tis was a true champion, when comes such another?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more