Skip to main content

The surprises continue

We're just past the halfway stage of the tournament and I have to again echo the sentiment of my last (World Cup related) post. Compared to 2007, the level of play has been much more exciting at least if not qualitatively better. Today's final 6 over burst from NZ was a perfect example. In all likelihood the result won't make any difference (except maybe to standings and thereby who the teams play in the quarters) but nevertheless the quality of hitting was astonishing. Flat pitches, small grounds are all fine but the ball still has to be hit and the consistency with which modern day players manage to do so is mind-boggling at times. The Eng-SA game over the weekend was also much fun with Anderson bowling one of the best spells I've seen in a one-day in recent times. The unpredictability too has been great to watch with performances from all manner of players. If someone had predicted that at the halfway stage Andrew Strauss and Shahid Afridi would be at the top of the runs and wickets charts, they would have made a killing. The bowlers list in particular makes for very heartening reading and Afridi has been a real revelation as this article lays out.

I on the other hand am not making a killing so far with my fantasy team. My excuse is that I haven't made the right changes at the right time, the perfect rote excuse all selectors make ;-) At least I've hauled my way past a couple of the Cricinfo Star Wars league and hopefully I'll be near the top as the tournament draws to a close. The one blight on an otherwise fun tournament (no its not the UDRS) has been the number of injuries that have gone on even during the tournament. Hopefully there'll be no more casualties. It'll be a pity if injuries result in one of the quarter finals being a mismatch since we seem to be in line for one of the more evenly contested knock-out phases in recent memory.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

The Ashes part deux: series preview

While I admire the honest, outspoken style that Ian Chappell has in his commentary and writing I don't find myself agreeing with his views very often. This latest piece on ESPNcricinfo is an exception though. In what is a faintly ridiculous set of back to back Ashes series (to accommodate an ODI World Cup of all things), the build-up to the second round has been laughable almost. Anyone who hasn't followed the game for a few years might be forgiven if they thought that the Australian domination from the 1990s and early 2000s has continued and that they will win in a canter again. For a team that's lost seven of their last nine matches (and it should have been eight really), that's quite a good turnaround on paper (and digitally). The reality though is that unless they show a drastic improvement (especially in terms of scoring runs) and England have a bit of a shocker, its going to be well nigh impossible for Australia to win back the urn. Despite putting Buffoon Bo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more