Skip to main content

The battle for No. 3

Since the decline in Australian domination post 2007, teams appear to have become obsessed with being ranked #1 in Test cricket as though a numerical calculation mattered more than actual results and winning Test matches. The fact that the ranking has changed hands four times in the last five years is almost testament to the fact that teams are driven more by wanting to reach the top spot than on staying there once they make it. Graeme Smith's team will claim that they are the most deserving holders of the mace given their consistency in the last five years plus the fact that they have beaten both Eng and Aus away, and not lost to India in India ie they have outperformed their closest contenders in their home conditions. The truth though is that there is no clear-cut champion at the moment.

What is very clear though is that the upcoming Pataudi Trophy series is a contest to decide third and fourth place. In current form and team circumstances, the teams battling each other down under currently are clearly ahead of England and India. South Africa are still the best all-round unit (ie with the fewest weaknesses) and Australia have a captain who's proving to be inspirational and in the form of his life. Dhoni's men and Cook and co on the other hand are having to rebuild and as Osman Samiuddin puts it, the biggest learning from the series will be how much more rebuilding the losing team will need to do.

Still, a contest between equally flawed teams is often as thrilling as that between equally good ones so I'm eagerly waiting for play to begin in less than six hours time!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?
Post a Comment
Read more

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...
Post a Comment
Read more