Skip to main content

Champions Trophy: Who will Patil and gang bet on?

My appetite for ODI cricket has gone down in recent times and (as I wrote here), now that a certain little man won't be opening the innings in his #99 jersey I'll find it harder to tune in.

Nevertheless, the upcoming Champions Trophy is going to be an interesting one because its so open. With Australia, India, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan (who between them have contested all the 50 over World Cup finals since 1996) all in transitional periods, South Africa and England will probably be marginal favourites. And if that in itself is unusual for a limited overs tournament, the fact that the Kiwis are always competitive and the West Indies are the current world T20 champions means that the ICC couldn't have hoped for a better run-up to the next World Cup.

As the squads start to be announced, I'm going to indulge in a bit of playing selector and picking what I think the Indian squad should be. The fact that Sehwag, Harbhajan, and Zaheer didn't make it to the 30 probables makes its a bit harder given those were three I would have pruned from the list! Seriously though, its good to see Patil and co bite the bullet on them and go with younger players and lets hope they do that when the announce the final 15. For now, I am doing that and the first thing to nail down is the composition. Given that the tournament is in England in June, I would look to keep a little more depth in the batting (which is the Indian way as it is) and the quick bowling (much harder given the pool). One wicketkeeper is sufficient given the short nature of the tournament and Dhoni's fitness standards. So my mix would be seven specialist batsmen, one wicketkeeper, five seamers, and two spinners. Picking openers is a bit tricky but I'm going to be courageous and go for Shikhar Dhawan and Ajinkya Rahane as my first choice pair with M Vijay as back up. I like a left-right combination at the top and Rahane's success on the last trip to England edges him ahead of Vijay. For the rest, Virat Kohli,  Suresh Raina, and Rohit Sharma pick themselves as the young triumvirate of Indian limited overs batting. For the last batting slot, I'm going to be bold and pick Dinesh Karthik ahead of Yuvraj and Tiwary. I firmly believe that a post-cancer Yuvraj is now way past his best and doesn't have a future in the Indian team in any format (no room for sentiment here). Tiwary hasn't got too many chances so a bit harsh on him but I've always been a bigger fan of Karthik's adaptability and strokeplay and he also acts as cover for Dhoni if needed. In terms of the bowling, the spinners are the easier bit with Ashwin and Jadeja being firmly ahead of the pack for now. Bhuvneshwar, Ishant, and Shami Ahmed have also done enough in the last few ODIs India played to slot in and a fit again Umesh Yadav is an automatic selection too. That leaves one seamer's slot and for that I will plump for Irfan Pathan. His left arm angle adds variety to the attack especially given that in Bhuvneshwar and Shami there are already (potentially) superior versions of Praveen Kumar and Vinay Kumar.

So there you have it, that's the fifteen who I think have the best chance of bringing home the trophy for India. For what its worth, my first XI would be (in batting order): Dhawan, Rahane, Kohli, Rohit, Raina, Dhoni, Jadeja, Ashwin, Bhuvneshwar, Ishant, and Yadav. India's first two games are at Cardiff and the Oval against South Africa and the West Indies respectively and on those tracks (and against those teams), two spinners is the way to go. For the Pakistan game, I might consider bringing in Irfan instead of Jadeja but that call can be made later. Predictions, predictions, now lets see how the real thing goes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...