Skip to main content

Up or down?

I hate the joke about London buses and two coming along at once but the point it makes is interesting and one that does seem to happen often in life (or is it just a matter of perception?).

Batting stances are not something I've paid huge amounts of attention to in the past, mainly because I've always believed that results matter, technique doesn't. And in cricket, more than many other sports, success is more about mental strength than technical ability.

So to come across not one but two articles on the very same (and not oft written about) topic of bat position was very educational to say the least. The first one was more informational and a touch provocative in that it takes a relatively firm stance that bat down is better than up. The second one was more specifically about Root and his technical deficiencies stemming from being bat up. Interestingly they were written by the same person so clearly SB Tang feels deeply about the issue.

Not deeply enough though to look at batsmen beyond Australia and England and understand the issue at a more global level (there is a passing mention of Jacques Kallis somewhere in there. My feeling is that batsmen in most other countries (and certainly Asian batsmen) are all taught to be bat down but that might be changing. Maybe a topic for a future post sometime if I find enough time to "research" on YouTube :-)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...

Quick singles: Why the double standards?

I'm no fan of David Warner's but for once, I'm firmly and squarely on his side . Sportspersons are probably treated the most unfairly by public opinion (and often the media) whenever they are involved in pay disputes. "Oh, look these millionaires are complaining about not getting paid enough" seems to be the gist of the general reactions. I find this attitude inexplicable at best and grossly hypocritical if I'm feeling less charitable. Like the rest of us, all athletes have the right to fight for what they think they should be paid. That is the fundamental part. In addition (and unlike many of the rest of us), most sportspersons operate in the knowledge that they only have a short period available as a performer, and therefore only a short period to maximise earnings. Most people that I know would behave exactly the same as Warner and his colleagues are doing. So why all the hue and cry?