Skip to main content

Please come back down to earth!

As always, the Indian media has a tendency to go overboard after a big win, especially one against Australia. And this time journos from other countries are joining in too. So now on the back of one (admittedly very comprehensive) win, India are suddenly world-beaters and the Aussies are chumps headed for a drop like the West Indies in the mid-90s. Funny what people write nowadays to generate copy :-)

Now, I was pretty chuffed at the way India played and the way they dominated the match right from the onset. I've never seen them play with so much steel and verve at the same time over five days, so yes if they keep playing like this, they will be the team to beat. But that's a big if. The last time they won two tests in a row in a series was back in 2005 against Sri Lanka (at home of course). And the last time they won two in a row against Australia was back in 2001 in that epic series. So, before writing obituaries of Australian dominance and anointing India as the next world champions, the media should probably at least wait for the Delhi and Nagpur tests, no?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of backward selections and England's future

A couple of interesting selectorial decisions recently by England and India (and actually as its turning out Australia as well!). For once I think the England selectors didn't panic and showed the right thinking by not picking either Key or Ramprakash for the Oval Test. And luckily for them, both Bell and Trott have performed well enough to vindicate the decision. India on the other hand have actually gone the other way bringing Dravid back to the one-day squad. I'm a bit ambivalent on that one. While the decision to leave out Rohit Sharma and retain Raina was certainly the right one, bringing back Dravid is questionable. It would have been a bolder decision to pick someone like Kohli or Rahane who both played really well in the Emerging Players Trophy recently, mainly because Dravid is quite unlikely to feature in the 2011 World Cup so why bring him back now? As for the Aussies, they will certainly be regretting not picking Nathan Hauritz for the Oval. A defensive decision if...
Post a Comment
Read more

Happy New Year .....

....well almost......its only 2 months in to 2009 so I guess its not terribly late for the first post of the year :-) The end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 has been quite engrossing primarily because of the tussle for supremacy between Australia and South Africa. And its interesting how once again, the Aussies are showing that the biggest mistake 'pundits' can make is to write them off. But I am jumping way ahead. The series in Australia was a real cracker and it was great to see the Springboks actually delivering so well on their abilities for once and not choking at the big moments. And in Steyn, Amla, de Villiers, Duminy and Morkel they have some real stars in the making and should be a strong team for some time to come. Australia's struggles on the other hand were not surprising after their performance in India. The same guys, i.e. Hayden and Lee continued to underwhelm and with the inexplicable selection of Symonds made things worse for Ricky Ponting. They were a l...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Predictions..

So the time has come, a day late actually since I was supposed to put these in last night. Anyways, today's games have not changed my predictions so I can honestly say that I did not cheat :-) After a fairly pedestrian first round-robin phase, the tournament has finally kicked off and the ensuing games will hopefully see cricket of a much higher quality. My final four would be South Africa, India, Sri Lanka and New Zealand and an India-South Africa final would be a dream. Pakistan and the West Indies are certainly capable of causing an upset or two but I don't see them sneaking in. England and Ireland should draw up the rear which is a bit of a pity given that its on their home turf (or at least the former's). Its interesting how in cricket, home turf never seems to provide much advantage when it comes to big tournaments. Football is almost the exact opposite and on the face of it, that seems so counter-intuitive. There must be a sports psychology explanation of some sort. ...
Post a Comment
Read more