Skip to main content

The "great" Indian cricket follower

One of my most common laments about growing up as a cricket aficionado in India is the fact that the average Indian cricket fan is more of a fan of the Indian team than of the game itself. And even here they are fickle in that the same players go from hero to villain and back to hero every other day depending on Team India's fortunes. This piece (and especially the passage below) by one of my favourite cricket writers, Siddhartha Vaidyanathan sums it up nicely.

 "I have also been charitably compared to Mark Antony for switching sides and writing a eulogy for Tendulkar a day after advocating that he be dropped. I am stumped at the number of people who fail to understand that the first piece was about the selectors (and the rebuilding a team) and the second about celebrating an incredible career. I am also amazed at how many people think this is a zero-sum game.
What pains me is how a large part of discourse on the internet is so limited to black and white. You are apparently either for Sachin or against him. If you question his place in the side, you are a moron who has no right to express an opinion or an ignorant bum who has never held a bat in his life or someone with a vested interest."
This attitude towards Tendulkar is representative of the general malaise that affects cricket following in India and maybe (if I'm allowed to be a bit bombastic for a second) even Indian society in general. Everything has to be black and white. And while I don't agree with Vaidyanathan on dropping Tendulkar from the Test team, its not because I hesitate to see Tendulkar's failings or recognise that he is long past his prime. And I also think that many of the points that he makes are well thought out and true. And I'd love to have a discussion/argument with someone like Vaidyanathan on the topic. Sadly though, that's not something I can say of most Indians I talk cricket to.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Much ado about a run-out

Judging by the amount that's been said and written about Ian Bell's run-out-that-wasn't at Trent Bridge, you would think that it has been the most significant occurrence of the series so far when nothing could be further from the truth. Andrew Miller  and Samir Chopra seem to be of the opinion that it was the crucial turning point in the match, which I completely disagree with (the post-tea sessions on days one and two were far more critical and momentum shifting). Andy Flower says that if Tendulkar had been run-out similarly in Bombay, it would have caused an international incident. He's clearly feeling the effects of having been in the England cricket set-up for too long given that a) its very improbable that Tendulkar would do something as daft as Bell did, and b) when a controversial run-out (but within the laws) did happen to him (against Pakistan at Eden Gardens no less), Tendulkar went out to the crowd and appealed to them to calm down and let the game proceed...
Post a Comment
Read more

A kick up the backside

Its very interesting (and revealing) that so many Indian cricketers pull up their socks and become better players once they've been dropped from the side and left out in the cold for a while. The trend is even more prevalent currently when the selectors have a larger pool of good players to choose from. Dravid (from the one-day team), Kumble, Ganguly, Sehwag, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Harbhajan, the list goes on. In fact, the only people I can think of who haven't been dropped at any point in recent years are Tendulkar (in any form of the game), and Dravid (from the Test team). This article in the TOI attributes their post-drop performance improvements (at least in Yuvraj's case and a few more as well) to anger. I'm not too sure I agree. I think its more a generic Indian mentality of taking things easy and getting soft and comfortable too easily. Its a national trait and one that needs great guarding against. I've discovered the hard way how getting physically unfit or slack...
Post a Comment
Read more

First thoughts on the Ashes

The only minor surprise for me in the 2013 Australian Ashes squad announced last week was the selection of James Faulkner ahead of Moises Henriques as the second all-rounder. Minor because given  the Shane Watson shenanigans of recent times, I would have thought that Inverarity and co would have opted for a second batting all-rounder (which is what Henriques clearly is). Instead they've gone with a bowling all-rounder in Faulkner and it'll be interesting to see what happens if Watson's batting woes in Test match cricket continue in the first two Tests. As for the rest of the squad, given the way the inexperienced batting performed in India, Rogers and Haddin were always going to make it in to the team and the choice of Khawaja over Smith appears sound too given that the latter's strength is in playing spin bowling. The batting still looks as unsettled and shaky as the Indian fast bowling line-up and its here that the series will be won or lost for the Aussies. The retu...
Post a Comment
Read more