Skip to main content

The "great" Indian cricket follower

One of my most common laments about growing up as a cricket aficionado in India is the fact that the average Indian cricket fan is more of a fan of the Indian team than of the game itself. And even here they are fickle in that the same players go from hero to villain and back to hero every other day depending on Team India's fortunes. This piece (and especially the passage below) by one of my favourite cricket writers, Siddhartha Vaidyanathan sums it up nicely.

 "I have also been charitably compared to Mark Antony for switching sides and writing a eulogy for Tendulkar a day after advocating that he be dropped. I am stumped at the number of people who fail to understand that the first piece was about the selectors (and the rebuilding a team) and the second about celebrating an incredible career. I am also amazed at how many people think this is a zero-sum game.
What pains me is how a large part of discourse on the internet is so limited to black and white. You are apparently either for Sachin or against him. If you question his place in the side, you are a moron who has no right to express an opinion or an ignorant bum who has never held a bat in his life or someone with a vested interest."
This attitude towards Tendulkar is representative of the general malaise that affects cricket following in India and maybe (if I'm allowed to be a bit bombastic for a second) even Indian society in general. Everything has to be black and white. And while I don't agree with Vaidyanathan on dropping Tendulkar from the Test team, its not because I hesitate to see Tendulkar's failings or recognise that he is long past his prime. And I also think that many of the points that he makes are well thought out and true. And I'd love to have a discussion/argument with someone like Vaidyanathan on the topic. Sadly though, that's not something I can say of most Indians I talk cricket to.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Et tu?

As a single sport website, I think Cricinfo has brought about a revolution and the fact that they were bought by ESPN is testament to how highly valued they've become. Their editing and approach to articles/opinion has been refreshing to say the least and even though they seem to have had a lot of editorial staff movement they've usually maintained very high standards. Off late though, both in their headline styles as well as in actual content, there seems to be an occasional slippage of standards and an inching towards the modern media sensationalism which is a bit of a pity. This piece  by Siddharth Monga is a classic example. Granted that the last two press conferences by Dhoni and Sehwag  indicated clearly that the captain and his deputy did not agree on this aspect of selection but "discord", "dissent", "public sniping" feels rather presumptuous and heavy handed. Yes, it is a team sport but there is no reason why everyone on the team needs ...
1 comment
Read more

England in the 90s revisited and oh, for backup bowlers!

So its come to this finally. As the cliche goes, the wheel comes full circle. Australian selection policies these days resemble that of England from the 1990s :-) Took a quick look at the last two years and over 37 Test matches since 1 Jan 2008, Australia have used 36 different players. That's an average of roughly one additional/new player every 1.48 matches! Talk about instability. When compared to India (a new player every 1.94 matches), South Africa (2.14), England (2.24) it shows how things have changed in the last two years with regards to the power balance in Test cricket. What the overall stat also does not show directly is that most of these new players have been bowlers. With the exception of replacing Hayden and Symonds the batting line-up has been quite stable but the bowling has been the exact opposite. Indian spinners like Amit Mishra, Piyush Chawla, Ashwin, and Murali Kartik must be ruing the fact that they don't have an Australian passport! The latter in parti...
2 comments
Read more

World T20 preview: surprises in store again?

In its short history of seven years (and four editions), the World T20 has thrown up many surprises. Four different winners (each of them unfancied at the start of the tournament), with even England winning silverware. Australia have made just one final and have yet to win (but then it took them till the fifth edition to win the Champions Trophy too). Possibly the most surprising fact about the World T20 is that we're into the fifth edition but India are yet to host one. Given that their victory in the inaugural tournament led to the IPL and the face of the modern game changing, I would have expected a 1987 like scenario with the BCCI doing its utmost to host the championships but that has not been the case. Maybe the IPL brand needs protection in their opinion? The latest version in Bangladesh will throw up plenty more to add to the list of the surprises I'm sure. Its been a pleasant change already to have a proper qualifying tournament between the lower ranked teams  as opp...
Post a Comment
Read more